Stupid Linux Hype

Why the Unbundling Windows Sceptics are Wrong


n doing so, the Globalisation Institute draws a distinction between open, free markets, which exist for computer hardware and demonstrate phenomenal innovation and price performance, and laissez-faire markets, dominated by the corporate equivalent of Somali warlords – specifically, operating system platforms.

In response, others have replied with reasons they believe would prevent such an approach from succeeding.

The following are the key arguments they introduce against the unbundling of Microsoft Windows from consumer PCs, along with an explanation as to why these arguments from the 'unbundling sceptics' are invalid:


.
.
.

The usability and technology world doesn't revolve around Walt Mossberg. Mossberg may have indicated that desktop Linux isn't for the average user, but it's also possible to find many pundits who will say that desktop Windows isn't for the average user either; that doesn't stop most PC makers from bundling Windows with their PCs.

In the end, it's all about what you're used to. Mossberg is used to Windows, so it seems more 'normal' to him. In time, people will, due to the increased uptake of Linux bought about by a liberated market, also find that it too is 'normal'.



I have linux. 7 full reformats to get it installed properly. The world may not revolve around Mossberg, but Linux still needs work.


It would also add complexity for end users, counter to The Institute's claims. People buy operating systems pre-installed with bunch of different applications beyond what comes with the operating system. Office productivity apps, security apps, you name it. An uninstalled OS would force users to find and download or buy those apps. That's an added and inconvenient step that would cost hours.


More than hours. Most of the linux apps are crap. And the Linux office suite isn't ready for the big time yet , not as of Ubuntu 6.10 , though it's been a while since I tested it.

Long and short of it :

Windows is a pirate, and they're ripping you off good.
Most of the alternatives (Apple OS2 , etc) are in fact just as bad. Either they lack the vast selection of windows software, or they make you pay through the nose now that you're stuck with their os.

Linux offers the promise of getting out of this trap. But it is just a promise so far, it has not yet bloomed into the full flower of how great it could be.

And articles like this that make promises that Linux cannot keep , do nothing but stunt the growth of that flower. Linux is getting there, but it isn't ready for main stream yet. And thats the state of the Linux situation at this moment.