Yet Another Liberal Program

Liberals urge more internet, cellphone competition


The Liberals are calling for stronger competition and rules on internet and cellphone services.


This sounds wonderful. So whats the problem ?

The problem is the gun registry that the Liberals made. It was supposed to cost 2 million dollars, it's now 2 billion and it barely functions. It has in fact blocked the progress of a real gun registry.

And the Liberals defend it tooth and nail , you are wasting billions of tax dollars if you shut it down yadda yadda ... and the darn thing cost a fortune to run and will eventually die anyways. But the Liberal friends you can be certain are getting rich on this project.

This is what happens when the Liberals "vow" to fight the gun problem in Canada. Suddenly things balloon to a thousand times what they should cost, and they still don't work. And you can't afford them ,but they kick and scream and it's just a huge scam and we're all sick of it.

And now they want to do it again with the cell phones.


Another 2 billion will be wasted.

And nothing will be done to restrain the friends of the Liberals (any big business contributing to their election coffers) from doing any thing they please.

No wonder they're frequently called the Fiberals.

Windows 7 Advert

I'm sorry. I just couldn't resist.

Dziekanski's mother sues over airport Taser death

Article


Robert Dziekanski's mother is suing the federal and provincial governments, four RCMP officers and the Vancouver International Airport for the loss of her son.

Dziekanski died minutes after he was shocked up to five times with a Taser by the RCMP in the arrivals lounge of the airport two years ago.

The lawsuit names the four RCMP officers involved, Const. Kwesi Millington, Const. Bill Bentley, Const. Gerry Rundel and Cpl. Benjamin (Monty) Robinson, but none of them have been charged with any offence in relation to Dziekanski's death.




This is like the OJ simpson trial, where everyone knows these jackles are guilty but they get off scott free with murder. Now she's gonna sue them for some silly reason like not reading hte instructions on their Taser manual or something.

Despite the fact they were caught on camera committing the murder.

It's a joke. A sick joke. Four murders wandering around free. And we the people of canada are their lawful prey , they can off us any time they like.

As long as they do it with a Taser.

New York Times Sick Humour

Ok. First some explanation.

They arrested a guy because they thought maybe he might be a terrorist.

They put him in jail (guantanama bay ) for 7 years with all the other
terrorists.

Now they know he's innocent , but they don't want to release him because
he's been exposed to terrorists (in their jail ) for seven years so
even if he was innocent to start, he's probably a die hard terrorist now.

So they want to keep him locked away forever.

Sick eh ?

Now read how the great and wonderful New York Times explains this self
same situation.

A Detainee’s Case Shows the Hurdles That a Release Poses

According to them, all the perpetrators of this horrible crime come up smelling of roses. Sick sick sick.

Why America is Losing the War

Report Cites Firefight as Lesson on Afghan War



A few days later, they were almost overrun by 200 insurgents.

That firefight, a debacle that cost nine American lives in July 2008, has become the new template for how not to win in Afghanistan


Ok. You were attacked by 200 insurgents. And you beat them off. And you took 9 casualties.

I would portray this as a victory.

But the New York Times has decided to portray this as a defeat. What went wrong. Almost overrun. Debacle. Who messed up ? Who's the blame ?

America is losing , because it has decided to lose. Every thing, even ridiculous victories like this , is now portrayed as if it had been a shattering defeat.

How badly where they out numbered ? And they only took 9 casualties, and it's pretty much a certainty that the insurgents took a lot more than 9. More like 90, but that isn't mentioned.

This is an astounding victory. The New York Times is mourning a debacle that cost the lives of 9 soldiers, and looking to blame everyone in sight.

This is why you lost. Because you choose to lose.